mirror of
https://github.com/coder/coder.git
synced 2025-07-03 16:13:58 +00:00
chore: improve validation of Security tag in swaggerparser (#15660)
Aims to resolve #15605 There's currently one option valid for the `@Security` tag in swaggerparser - which fails in the CI if we try to put any other value. At least one of our endpoints does not accept `CoderSessionToken` as an option for the authentication and so we need to add new possibilities in order to keep the documentation up-to-date. In this PR , I added `ProvisionerKey` which is the way our provisioner daemon can authenticate to the backend - also modified a bit the code to simplify other options later.
This commit is contained in:
@ -300,6 +300,11 @@ func assertPathParametersDefined(t *testing.T, comment SwaggerComment) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func assertSecurityDefined(t *testing.T, comment SwaggerComment) {
|
||||
authorizedSecurityTags := []string{
|
||||
"CoderSessionToken",
|
||||
"CoderProvisionerKey",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if comment.router == "/updatecheck" ||
|
||||
comment.router == "/buildinfo" ||
|
||||
comment.router == "/" ||
|
||||
@ -308,7 +313,7 @@ func assertSecurityDefined(t *testing.T, comment SwaggerComment) {
|
||||
comment.router == "/users/otp/change-password" {
|
||||
return // endpoints do not require authorization
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, "CoderSessionToken", comment.security, "@Security must be equal CoderSessionToken")
|
||||
assert.Containsf(t, authorizedSecurityTags, comment.security, "@Security must be either of these options: %v", authorizedSecurityTags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func assertAccept(t *testing.T, comment SwaggerComment) {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user